It is based on 2010 sold data(sold price-purchased price) and homes value differential
(Zestimate $-mortgage).
Both parameters correlate remarkbly well. I do notice that few if any communities are immune
to "homes under water", these days. The source is from SF Chronical website.
Sam Shueh, cdpe, mba
Realtor
City | zip | % sold for loss | % under water |
San Jose | 95134 | 56% | 41% |
San Jose | 95111 | 73% | 29% |
San Jose | 95116 | 68% | 29% |
San Jose | 95122 | 71% | 26% |
San Jose | 95136 | 44% | 25% |
Gilroy | 95020 | 64% | 25% |
San Jose | 95123 | 52% | 25% |
San Jose | 95133 | 59% | 24% |
San Jose | 95110 | 58% | 24% |
San Jose | 95112 | 54% | 23% |
San Jose | 95127 | 69% | 22% |
San Jose | 95139 | 54% | 22% |
San Jose | 95121 | 63% | 22% |
San Jose | 95131 | 32% | 21% |
Sunnyvale | 94085 | 46% | 20% |
Santa Clara | 95054 | 23% | 18% |
San Jose | 95138 | 44% | 18% |
Morgan Hill | 95037 | 47% | 16% |
San Jose | 95119 | 50% | 16% |
Milpitas | 95035 | 38% | 16% |
Sunnyvale | 94089 | 24% | 16% |
San Jose | 95002 | 30% | 16% |
San Jose | 95126 | 32% | 15% |
San Jose | 95148 | 55% | 14% |
San Martin | 95046 | 40% | 13% |
San Jose | 95118 | 35% | 13% |
San Jose | 95132 | 42% | 13% |
Santa Clara | 95050 | 24% | 13% |
Mountain View | 94043 | 19% | 12% |
Campbell | 95008 | 24% | 11% |
San Jose | 95117 | 27% | 11% |
San Jose | 95128 | 37% | 11% |
Santa Clara | 95051 | 23% | 11% |
San Jose | 95135 | 27% | 10% |
San Jose | 95125 | 25% | 10% |
Sunnyvale | 94086 | 20% | 9% |
San Jose | 95124 | 24% | 6% |
Mountain View | 94040 | 12% | 5% |
San Jose | 95129 | 9% | 4% |
Los Gatos | 95032 | 12% | 4% |
Palo Alto | 94301 | 13% | 3% |
Mountain View | 94041 | 9% | 3% |
Palo Alto | 94304 | 0% | 3% |
San Jose | 95120 | 8% | 3% |
Palo Alto | 94306 | 8% | 2% |
Sunnyvale | 94087 | 5% | 2% |
Saratoga | 95070 | 10% | 2% |
San Jose | 95130 | 28% | 2% |
Los Gatos | 95030 | 9% | 1% |
Cupertino | 95014 | 7% | 1% |
Los Altos Hills | 94022 | 8% | 1% |
Los Altos | 94024 | 7% | 1% |
Sam Shueh, mba, cdpe
1519182
sshueh@gmail.com